From Stability to Crisis: The Consequences of Police Misconduct in James Ratzlaff’s Life

Hi, my name is James Ratzlaff and I am fundraising to litigate insurmountable Misconduct and Lawlessness habitually implemented by the Abbotsford Police Department; without any degree of accountability.

 

I needed to document and express a comprehensive view of disastrous interaction between myself – seeking relief from ubiquitous threatening illegal behavior imposed by an unregulated assortment of lawless others continuously demanding unfettered access to my home and my material possessions – and the severely substandard professional conduct of Constable Kevin Small (reinforced by follow-up of peers attending to nuanced parallel concerns) insisting on circumstances encouraging escalation of lawless victimization during the summer of 2015. This comprehensive account is inclusive of the broader unrestrained pattern of extrajudicial retaliatory victimization supervised and implemented by senior Officers united in a formally dysfunctional capacity informally validated by the Administration of the Abbotsford Police Department.

 

• This is another episode of serial Police Misconduct for which the only reaction to submitted complaint of Police Misconduct is an undeterred pattern of intensified Misconduct – including specific blatant violations of law and a general disregard for Rule-Of-Law – from which there is no escape or deterrent. I am unaware of anyone ever phoning ahead to a Police Department in search of permission to access the Police Department and its resources. Yet after I phoned ahead for acquiring and receiving permission; the subsequent reaction was to formally draft a document illegally forbidding me from attending the premises. Judy Dizy/Bird then decided to destroy all my written communication with Police Department as justified upon her declaration that consideration of my written communication – or delegating consideration of my written communication – was not among her official duties as a Police Officer. The only way to minimize Police Conduct is to minimize my life.

 

Darryl Smith had already been staying with me for about one week at that point. The original plan was for him to stay with me for one or two weeks until such time that he had secured his own accommodation elsewhere or he would continue couch surfing among assorted acquaintances otherwise unknown to me. The situation was fine for the first few days when he continued to follow the few specific guidelines which I had always insisted upon. I shared the use of my home for sleeping, eating, showering, shitting and social interaction with only myself. All other social interactions and illegal activity – including narcotics consumption/sales – must be pursued off-premises. If Darryl Smith continued residing with me more than ten days, I stipulated that I would make him aware of a requisite weekly fee which he would be obligated to pay.

 

After a number of days, the situation rapidly deteriorated. Following a brief afternoon visit from his girlfriend Trina ... Trina suddenly decided it would be more prudent for her to reside permanently in my home. It was even more prudent for Trina to decide to never pay rent. She also suddenly decided that it was intensely more important that she suddenly post a Chore Wheel on the kitchen wall for actively promoting completion of any chore which she assigned to be completed by the individual she had assigned to complete the chore. Additionally, she created a comprehensive list of rules which she demanded only I must respect at all times. Trina was comfortable insisting that she must live in my home ... but Trina was also comfortable insisting it was not her responsibility to pay for any expenses associated with living in my home.

 

Both Darryl and Trina made it known that they were not in the mood for paying any portion of the rent or sharing the cost of any other expenses including food. Darryl would respond by informing me of my duty to compromise for what was best for all three of us. Trina made it known to that, in her capacity as Darryl’s girlfriend; it was never her duty to pay for her expenses. She would further express disappointment that Darryl continued to refuse accepting his responsibility to pay for her living costs.

 

In spite of my many vocal protests, Darryl Smith and Trina started selling narcotics from my home 24/7; while doing their best to prevent my door from being locked as a means of conveying customer appreciation; which also granting a discernible convenience to a growing number of criminal customers typically refraining from the nicety of knocking on doors which they frequented.

 

It became painfully obvious that Darryl Smith and Trina would never consider voluntarily vacating my home. They were never going to pay me. Trina was never going to stop nagging me about mandatory chores she assigned to me on the Chore Wheel. I was always going to be surrounded by hostile intruders stealing my things.

 

Together, they periodically focused on common matters outside of my home with the some regularity. On such occasions, it would not have been difficult to lock them out, thereby, permanently denying them re-entry into my home from that point forward. If circumstances had not been significantly more complicated than that, I could have regained control of my home with a minimal degree of drama. The twisted situation was immensely more complicated than that.

 

The ex-con residing two-doors the hall, projecting a formidably threatening presence in combination with an intimidating physique, aggressively declared that he would be continuously managing conditions in my home including retail sales of narcotics and various other contraband. Steve Duncan would seize money and heroin for daily compensation in exchange for his predominantly-apathetic managerial role; daily compensation in the form of habitual narcotics consumption was a vital requirement for neutralizing negative side effects from which he would otherwise suffer due to long-term heroine dependency. These pending dictated conditions to be forcibly imposed within my home, would further define my increasingly-marginalized role within my home as a rigidly paralyzed existence of inescapable impotence.

 

Steve Duncan would enter my home on a daily basis for seizing anything he wanted and to yet again threaten me with physical harm. He said if I did anything to disrupt his business arrangement, or if I made any attempt to flee my home, he would immediately break at least one of my arms.

 

I decided I should yet again be the only individual living in my home. This would also make it more likely that I would once again be the only individual having legitimate authority and control to determine conditions germane to my life and my home.

 

I told Darryl and Trina that there were a number of outstanding reasons as to why they must immediately reside elsewhere. From a total of a great many of these, there were 2 primary reasons. In spite of my continuous demands that narcotics must not be sold from my home, they continued selling dope 24/7 while concomitantly never locking my door a as continual parade of contagious criminals wondered into my home all day and all night looking for things to steal while I was awake or sleeping.

 

Secondly they would never pay any token amount towards the common expenses I alone incurred for rent, utilities, toilet paper, cleaning products, food, and a frustrating pattern of orchestrated theft which they blatantly facilitated. They would only eat from my groceries. Though they always collected a steady stream of lucrative income, while also systematically disappearing my possessions of greatest value until I no longer possessed personal possessions. They refused to restrict or place limits on the number of contagious criminals wondering within my home in search of things to steal all day and all night while I was awake or sleeping.

 

Although I had originally given my consent for Darryl to briefly reside with me, I conveyed he was no longer welcome as his conduct had become inexcusable. As for Trina, I had never given my permission for her to reside in my home. It was even more important for her to reside elsewhere since she was absolutely never welcome in my home. When I told them to leave, they became increasingly confrontational. In their minds it was of no relevance that they refused to make a financial contribution. It did not matter to them that there was always an alarming quantity of questionable foot-traffic coming and going from my home. It did not matter to them that they were selling narcotics from my home against my express wishes. It did not matter to them that I never extended an invitation to Trina for her to stay in my home.

 

When I told them they had to leave, they reacted by vowing to never pay me any money, while also solemnly vowing to never move somewhere else. Tensions were dramatically rising. I asked my parents to have a Police Officer sent to me home. I also asked them to come over to sit with me in my home, as their presence might serve as a deterrent to potentially escalating criminal conduct.

 

It took about 3 or 4 hours for Constable Kevin Small to arrive. I explained that I never gave Trina permission to live in my home and I needed her to be removed. Darryl Smith would also need to live elsewhere. Trina was never shy about her perceived status in my home. She was not shy about declaring her intentions. She said she was never going to make any financial contribution to rent or expenses. She said she was never going to leave.

 

Darryl was out attending to questionable errands of illegality for the duration that Constable Small was in my home.

 

I revealed my other grievances about her. She was severely unpleasant, scolding me continually. She attempted to relentlessly clarify what I could and could not do in my home. She always ate my groceries because she never bought any food for herself. Even though I wanted my door to be locked at all times to keep us safe from intruders, she did her best to make sure the door was never locked. There were countless purloining strangers entering and leaving my apartment at will. My belongings were going missing and there was nothing I could do to address this situation.

 

Kevin did not consider any of these to be a problem. Darryl was my temporary guest. I offered to let him stay for a week or two. Kevin said any guest in my home was at liberty to do whatever he/she wanted in my home. He said that the same applied to any guest of guest. In the precise manner, the same applied to any guest of any guest of any guest. I explained that I had Darryl agree to some basic guidelines before I let him stay in my home. According to Kevin, anyone in my home has the unlimited freedom to do whatever they desire. He said no one in my home has an obligation to adhere to established guidelines as mutually agreed upon before staying with me. He said I was not permitted to restrict the conduct of anyone in my home regardless of whether their conduct was legal or illegal. He further clarified that it did not make any difference whether someone in my home was a non-paying guest or a long-term renter actually paying rent. He remained insistent that I never have the right to place any limitations on what someone can do, or can not do, in my home.

 

Kevin asked if Darryl was paying rent to reside in my home. I explained that he was not paying anything although earlier we had discussed a possibly that this was subject to change in the foreseeable future. As I had discussed with Darryl, I was letting him stay in my home for free for a week or two. After that, if the situation was agreeable, we would then negotiate a rental fee.

 

Based on this, Kevin announced that such a discussion which conveyed the possibility of negotiating a contract did in fact constitute the existence of a negotiated legally binding contract. He further assessed that since earlier discussions did not establish a set amount of monthly rent to be paid, this equated to an established amount of zero dollars per month. To be a valid and legally binding contract, five distinct conditions must be met. In this situation, those conditions were not met. Most notably, mutual consent of both parties did not exist. Additionally, I only allowed Darryl to temporarily reside in my home for as long as narcotics were not sold from my home and that he conduct his social life elsewhere in order maintain my privacy and security.

 

Declaring the existence of a binding contract when there clearly was no contract in effect is one of the many alarming examples demonstrating that Kevin was completely unqualified to make assessments in regard to aspects of the law which he was alarmingly ignorant. His assessments of these and all key considerations proved to be False, Illegal, Unhelpful, and/or Irrelevant.

 

I did not mention the situation specifically concerning narcotics to Kevin. He had already made it abundantly clear that the conduct of persons in my home was not to be restricted by any stipulation of Mutual Consent or my unilateral decision, nor shall conduct be lawfully restrained to limits of Legal Conduct. Since he was only focused on his projection that I needed to be dispossessed all authority to oversee conditions in my home for which I alone would remain legally responsible: I feared I would be arrested as being culpable for the Sale Of Narcotics which I strenuously prohibited.

 

According to Kevin, the fictional presence of this fabricated legally binding contract, as above, which Kevin had conjured, bestowed the right of Permanent Residence to Darryl and every conceivable acquaintance of Darryl without any restrictions of conduct. He continued to erroneously declare that Darryl and any number of people tenuously associated with Darryl, were free to reside in my home completely void of any financial obligation because we had so far neglected to negotiate a specific fee. He declared that the fictional contract which he conjured, superseded all conditions and stipulations specified by my lease.

 

The lack of a negotiated fee in any contract is never to be interpreted as equating to binding contract in which one party receives all specific goods or services for free. This was just one more instance in which he felt confident to decree legal particulars based on a thorough absence of understanding anything resembling applicable law.

 

Having never discussed any of this with Darryl – and in violation of my lease – he revealed his decision that Darryl was the now the dominant recognized legal authority for determining conditions within my home for which I must be compliant.

 

• I imagined Kevin was aware that Police never have authority to invalidate or modify any lease. It was difficult to determine whether he was committed to extending an ongoing pattern of inescapable Police Misconduct or if he was merely Monumentally Stupid. Either way, he was certainly incompetent.

 

Kevin stated that he needed to speak with Trina in private. When I reside alone in my home, I tend to sleep on the couch. So, for the time being, I let Darryl sleep in the bedroom. Trina also slept there but not with my permission. I always made it very clear that I absolutely never gave her permission to stay in my home.

 

Kevin proceeded to my bedroom to speak with Trina. I don’t know what was said in there but when he came out of the bedroom, he was a passionate supporter for Team Trina. He had been divinely inspired to continue fabricating decrees. He informed me that I was no longer permitted entry into my bedroom nor was I permitted access to any of my possessions located in my bedroom; I must always be noticeably polite when speaking with Trina or any other Criminal Element having strayed into my home.

 

Oddly, although he was emphatic that I never possessed legitimate legal authority for establishing guidelines of conduct for others; he felt compelled to impose illegal conditions of conduct upon myself in favor of the lawless rabble infesting my home.

 

He said Trina, Darryl and all other undefined persons were permitted to reside in my home for as long as they desired without ever being required to pay any portion of the rent, groceries, or utilities. Ensuring Trina was also privy to these most recent illegal decrees, he stated no one other than myself was responsible for incurring all financial expenses and I was absolutely prohibited to accept financial contributions from anyone else which might diminish the entire burden which I alone must bear.

 

He advised that any illegal decrees which I disagreed, needed to be challenged via the Supreme Court in conjunction with the regulated oversight of the Residential Tenancy Branch. Again, he insisted that his ignorance must reign supreme. The Residential Tenancy Act does not apply in situations where there is a shared kitchen or bathroom.

 

None of this made practical or legal sense. In response to my request for Police Assistant to regain control of my home, Constable Kevin Small rapidly made known his very abrupt illegal decisions that control of my home must be awarded to itinerant hostile persons for which I would then be the only unwelcome individual in my home; for which I alone must finance all living expenses of all openly hostile persons.

 

Aside from being illegal, the hostile conditions which he imposed were ruinous to me and in no way sustainable; and ultimately of benefit to no one. Even if I was willing and able to indefinitely finance the pervasive threatening and abusive conditions ensuring that all material possessions were stolen from my home, everyone in my home (inclusive of myself) would soon be evicted due to violations of my lease; in spite of his insistence that the fabricated contract always superseded my lease.

 

If anyone has the misfortune of consulting with a clearly incompetent physician completely uninterested in a positive outcome for the patient, for whom everything the doctor says proves to be false, unhelpful and/or irrelevant; the patient has the right to seek a competent physician who might not be Monumentally Stupid and not determined to impose ruinous conditions guaranteed to destroy the patient.

 

• Assessments by Constable Kevin Small of all key considerations proved to be False, Illegal, Unhelpful, and/or Irrelevant.

 

There are no functional deterrents to Police Misconduct nor Monumental Stupidity.

 

Even if my would-be captors has not eagerly taken advantage of the immense vulnerabilities imposed by the APD blatantly facilitated my Criminal Victimization, fascist conditions solidifying my status as an APD-Victim assuring barbarous loss of liberty and abject poverty were present from immediate onset of Kevin’s horror.

 

After everything of value had been removed from my personal possession, Constable Bryce Shultz strenuously urged me to hastily abandon my home in order to join the convivial ranks of homeless persons. I had nowhere to go and no money. I acquired accommodation within my budget-range of zero-dollars per day. I checked into the Psychiatric Ward of our local hospital.

 

The hospital staff diagnosed me as being clearly delusional because there is no way they would ever accept that the Police would so thoroughly oversee the destruction of someone’s home and every conceivable facet of their life. Additionally, I was informed that if I was truly not experiencing a delusional mental state, then I belonged elsewhere in a dank Homeless Shelter rather than taking residence at the hospital for reasons unrelated to medical circumstances.

 

I was no longer in a viable position of moving overseas to be with my wife. I was not even in any position to pay the upcoming rent. My wife absolutely did not believe the events which I conveyed to her. Since the police in the Philippines would never put someone in this position I was forcefully victimized into, she will absolutely never believe the police in democratic Canada would oversee and enforce the destruction of a citizen in distress. We have never spoken again, although we continue to be married. Philippines is a country of enduring Catholic tradition with no mechanism for divorce; although any divorce granted in another nation will be recognized in the Philippines. The last few abrupt conversations I featured her [reasonable] demands that I obtain a divorce in Canada so that she might continue forwards with her life.

 

I was then reduced to existing in Daddy ’s pocket if I wanted to avoid sleeping on the sidewalk. Just like that I became the same marginalized dependent as any other vulnerable Foster Kid Jerry continually subjected to demeaning and belittling during his drunken career of physical violence. This has always been the price paid by all who relied on material support and logistics from Jerry; even though the Provincial Ministry serving as the umbrella guardian for Foster Kids was paying all the bills, as well as the supremely lucrative tax-free monthly salary to Jerry.

 

The police and Crown think it a trivial concern that the illegal apathy of the APD ensured I was a de facto hostage in my home and forced to vacate my marriage. I should be in the Philippines with my wife. The APD completely destroyed my life in 2015. They choose not to consider that subsequent to the total derailment of my life, I live a severely sub-standard existence; and to then arrest me three years later in reaction to suffering yet another theft from my home is just one more cancerous corruption of justice entombing me in additional robust layers of powerlessness.

 

My abysmal existence was unalterably limited to a bewildering horror of absolute powerlessness from unyielding irrational and illegal imposition by the APD; for ensuring a rigid daily pattern exclusively composed of relentlessly re-occurring series of inflicted crimes, for which I was forced to continuously suffer without any available means of relief. Resolutely imposed impotent conditions of binding powerlessness guaranteed a readily foreseeable outcome of financial destitution, eradication of all conceivable personal resources and destruction of my marriage.

 

Avoiding the certainty of homeless destined from destructive punitive projection of consuming Criminal Conduct of the APD, as readily foreseeable consequence of unabated Victimization uncompromisingly imposed by the APD; would not have been possible without the intervening charitable financial input supplied by my father. But this created overwhelming strain on my relationship with my father; arising from the distortion of festering contention mutating from urgency of necessitated frantic financial dependence, proving to be irrevocably destructive.

 

My father and I were not on speaking terms during the two years preceding his death. This is among the many painfully debilitating consequences I continue to suffer, directly resultant to inescapable pattern of bewildering illegal Victimization actively facilitated by the APD; from which I will never be able fully recover.

 

The APD remains unwavering in fanatical commitment towards maintaining a silent refusal to indicate any form of acknowledgement regarding the prolonged previous pattern of established Misconduct escalating to an intensely-debilitating devastatingly thorough destruction inflicted upon all conceivable nuanced facets of my existence. Misconduct accomplished by flagrantly facilitating of inescapable daily criminal victimization imposed by the proxy of chronically hostile individuals arbitrarily awarded unconditional residence in my home (conveying unyielding apathy towards wholesale violation of legally-binding terms stipulated by my lease) supplemented by parallel decree of unlimited access to my home unconditionally granted all persons claiming to be vaguely associated with the chronically hostile individuals formally installed as my masters.

 

APD members and chronically hostile persons installed as my masters considered my views to be irrelevant in the APD-modified capacity of my specified role within my home designated as being restricted to powerless subservience.

 

Upon becoming aware of an existing state of contention between my father and myself, existing as a direct result of enforced powerlessness as nurtured by APD misconduct facilitating focused Victimization for achieving debilitating devastation suffered from the imposed destruction of my life; the APD concluded it should & would be keenly dedicated to support for official enactment fostering appearance of implementing a valid response, while concomitantly maintaining an ongoing fanatical commitment to never address nor mention the debilitating destructive conditions serving as undeniable underlying source of the manifest contention.

 

I imagine that subjecting me to enforced hospitalization [in the bold traditions of Stalinist Russia for routinely securing powerlessness by destructive enhancement fortifying absolutely unrecoverable negating of Justice] upon becoming aware of a contentious relationship was meant to appear as a kneejerk reaction of noble concern. If genuinely motivate by noble concern, the only valid response would have been focused on remedy of financial destitution (inevitably resulting in debilitating desperation) which the APD chose to maliciously thrust upon me.

 

I was a few months away from completing two years of disciplined preparation for fulfilling permanent relocation to Asia and resuming of a life shared with my wife who continued to reside in Asia. I was verging on fulfilling multiple major requirements for permanently securing monumental betterment of my life.

 

Imposed demanded illegal conditions upon my residence ensuring a complete lack of privacy and security; ensuring a complete lack of privacy and security extending to every aspect of my life. I was forced to observe the thorough dismantling of my life in the manner of a slow motion train-wreck from a vantage of powerlessness forced upon me. The APD deems it irrelevant that existence of our Constitution, Human Rights, a litany of impressive statutes, and my lease provides guarantee that I am never required to suffer the vulnerabilities which the APD demanded of me, for ensuring my home was dominated by an internal environment of Crime.

 

It has always been my understanding that the police department, in conjunction with an extensive Justice System, exists for the purpose of ensuring/promoting stability and security. The APD reserves the unfettered right to make passionately unjust determination, on a case-by-case basis, whether to secure the safety of an individual as guaranteed by legal protections to which everyone is entitled; or whether to relentlessly facilitate extensive Criminal Victimization for eventually achieving maliciously unrestrained destruction upon every facet of a person’s life.

 

Only the financial generosity which my father made available to me allowed me to avoid the certainty of homelessness which the APD had put into motion. But this does not diminish the reality that both I and my father were not remotely pleased that I was suddenly reduced to a financial tortured-dependence on my father.

 

I would be residing in Asia with my wife if the APD had not demanded imposed anarchic conditions in my home ensured I was always vulnerable to eradication of all personal resources. I would no longer be in Canada, and I would not have endured a pattern of demeaning groveling for very basic financial assistance from my father; causing our relationship to become predominantly contentious.

 

A lease ceases to have functional meaning or value when Police insist on the right to unilaterally redistribute or withdraw the binding legal authority upon an individual’s home specifically granted to the individual as stipulated by the lease. Constable Small capriciously provisioned himself with right to thoroughly and unlawfully destabilize the life of anyone by illegally invalidating any lease; in order to speciously achieve conspicuous domestic instability ultimately to be suffered by all.

 

Since the APD decided it is unassailably acceptable to instantly invalidate a legal contract existing in the format of a lease then there is no reason why they should not also unilaterally revoke or modify the terms of any random legal contract such as those establishing specific ownership applicable to any entity of financial value; which means it is equally reasonable to anarchically gift themselves with the right to arbitrarily cancel or modify content of any legal contract in addition to a lease.

 

APD-Victims forced to tolerate contentious relationships as a desperate means to meekly survive massively-destabilizing Police Misconduct from which a full recovery is never a possibility; will subsequently be subjected to enforced hospital confinement coupled with later follow-up arrest(s) for furthering momentum of chronic punitive ramification from misdirected culpability of induced desperate reliance on such contentious familial relationships due to those being the only perceivable option for acquiring resources potentially offering temporary ability to survive the binding pertinent disaster maliciously imposed by Police Misconduct.

 

My ongoing diminished existence remains a toxic reality as usurped on my behalf via primal deprivations as rigidly bound upon me by the APD-enabled removal of everything and everyone from my life having any degree of meaning or value. My ongoing diminished existence is infinitely different from the life I had chosen for myself. I deeply resent that dominant factors determining my quality-of-life are the lingering Victimizations enabled by the rampant tyranny imposed by the APD.

 

Daily communication via Skype with my wife residing in The Philippines was abruptly terminated due to the unyielding tornado of criminal activity firmly entrenched in my residence by decree of the APD. Theft of all electronic devices and finances prevented all means of communication with my wife as well as prohibiting communication with absolutely everyone else other than those boldly usurping illicit access to my home.

 

When I was finally able to contact my wife, I explained the inescapable circumstances of rampant Criminal Activity and Victimization entrenched in my home as facilitated by decree of Police Officers from the local Police Department. I also had to explain that my sudden state of abject poverty meant that I could no longer relocate to The Philippines in the near future but rather only after an excessive delay of undetermined duration.

 

Her inconsolable reaction was confined to an unbridled contemptuous rage. Maylin declared that I was obviously lying to mask my cruel intention of negating all my spousal obligations to her. She asserted that since Police in The Philippines would never engage in such an Abuse Of Power; then circumstances which I relayed could not have possibly occurred in the globally renowned democratically-progressive country of Canada.

 

Maylin conveyed her emphatic decision to invoke [informal] de facto termination of our marriage and permanently cease all communication between the two of us. Laws of The Philippines are overwhelmingly influenced by established historical religious conventions based upon traditional values promoted by the Catholic Church; and as such there is no existing [internal/domestic] legal mechanism allowing for legal decree of divorce.

 

In addition to insisting that I never again initiate contact for any purpose other than to communicate fulfillment of her finalizing frantic petition; she was vehemently insistent that I immediately secure a divorce decree issued in Canada since Philippine law does recognize the legality of divorces granted by the courts of foreign countries. This was in no way remotely possible; as inflicted abject poverty relegated depletion of all personal resources denying means for even mere avoidance of certain homelessness foisted upon me by decrees of the APD which facilitated the inescapable and readily foreseeable sustained hurricane of Criminal Victimization tortuously entrenched within my residence.

 

Upon being made aware of a contentious familial relationship, I was initially subjected to forced hospitalization arranged by the APD; which was then followed by applying legal charges of criminal harassment a few months later. I expect at some point [either before or after being informed of necessitated lengthy incarceration to be inescapably inflicted upon me as well] it will be communicated (or at least strenuously implied) by anonymous APD personnel, of additional punitive measures in accordance with the deciding of an alleged decision rendered by confidential source(s) impartially concluding a retroactive culpability on accusations of loitering and vagrancy. ... May god have mercy on my soul.

 

Markedly contentious state of the degraded relationship arose from toxic powerlessness as direct consequence of abject poverty imposed by decrees for eradicating decades of achieved Global abilities for Self-Determination mutating from the imposed conditions [as concomitantly revealed by the APD to both myself as well as those designated to be my eagerly-willing would-be captors and Criminal Victimizers; via granted permanent domestic dominance applicable to an ultimately indefinable quantity of persons void of all (financial) obligations] facilitating unrelenting intensive Criminal Victimization.

 

APD imposed destitution required routine groveling when interacting with my father in accordance with my sudden severely demeaning financial reliance, at such a relatively late point in my life, as the only means of avoiding/evading certainty of homelessness consequentially inexorably arranged on my behalf by the APD via callously unjust decrees imposing cancerous anarchy upon every subtle nuanced minor aspect of my life.

 

Rather than assisting me in a proactive manner for accessing of public resources of Victims Services promoting recovery from Criminal Victimization, I continued to face the aggression of unwavering fanatical commitment towards maintaining a silent refusal to indicate acknowledgement regarding suffered criminal activity entrenched in my home.

 

Rather than assisting me in a proactive manner for accessing of public resources of Victims Services promoting recovery from Criminal Victimization, it was deemed prudent for four police vehicles to display the indelibly grand public spectacle of a conspicuously confrontational apprehension from within my apartment building in a superlatively indiscreet fashion; ambushed purpose of forced psychiatric assessment.

 

I subsequently endured a substantial theft occurring within my home during the period of my APD-enforced absence. Persistent reporting of this theft to APD Administration, via multiple specific emails spanning an entire year, merely resulted in solidifying rigid entrenchment of unwavering fanatical resolve dramatically maintaining a silent refusal to indicate acknowledgement regarding previous as well as the entirety of all potentially pending Criminal Victimizations occurring within the remaining span of my lifetime.

 

It was mandated that I must routinely report to Community Corrections for one year as sentenced by the Court, establishing supervised motivation conducive to rehabilitation from outcomes deemed to be Criminally Deviant; as inflicted via inescapable Criminal Victimization resolutely bound upon me by the APD.

 

The APD insists on an obligation to ensure legal consequences are suffered on those who behave unfavorably in reaction to mandatory devastation of inescapable APD-facilitated relentless Criminal Activity.

 

Repeated identical requests for issuing [copies of] documents as mandated by binding Freedom Of Information legislation are usually granted after a period of laboriously repeated requests spanning nearly a decade. Some requests for specific documents will always be ignored. This is another example of legislation and Rule-Of-Law viewed as merely optional.

 

The pattern of crippling Victimization and Misconduct appears to be at least partially justified on the basis of rampant illegal discrimination having originated from received cancerous anecdotal information stating that I suffer from diagnosed psychiatric illness of Bi-Polar Disorder; as reported by person or persons with purely malevolent subjective and self-serving motives. Repeated requests for documents which potentially would definitively clarify this issue; continue to be ignored. This again illustrates that binding legislation is unlawfully and egregiously considered as being merely optional.

 

• Repeated requests for copies of the documentation pertaining to false psychiatric diagnosis on file with the APD were seemingly addressed by a recent letter from the APD for redirection of the onus onto me. The letter conveyed that the APD undergoes a tremendously draining process of monumentally mildly-adequate and nearly-sufficient scrutiny for predominantly ensuring a generic confirmation regulating the desired quasi-veracity of information on file. This was followed by a specific stipulated limited window of opportunity to engage authorities in Victoria as generously allowing a precious rare and pointless opportunity to correct many blatant falsehoods pertaining only to this false information on file with the APD.

 

• It was inferred that I will be deemed as receiving tenuous granting of formal approval indicating permission of reasonable opportunity for a period of subjective timely-access to the corrected information on file at such time as notarized overwhelming affirmation is readily available for substantiating that I have indeed solely achieved successful remedial measures for ensuring the necessary requisite corrections having been applied to the false information.

 

• I am offered a bewildering disincentive of potentially qualifying for access to the corrected information I would be solely responsible for correcting; for which I already possess an obvious intimate familiarity. The APD may as well be dangling a time-limited potential willingness offering disclosure of my birthday.

 

• This original documentation is among the vital information withheld by the APD which I demand access; as firmly regulated by a conglomeration of undisclosed confidential illicit policies prohibiting all manner of accessibility & accountability; preventing modifications to Machiavellian conditions enabling permanency of officially validated inescapable Random Criminal Victimization.

 

• This means false medical information pertaining to myself remains effectively categorized as Confidential & None Of My Damn Business. This means that the APD will continue retaining medical information of persons on file, regardless of truth or falsehoods of that information, for fascist purposes of endorsing punitive discrimination as unequivocally prohibited by our Constitution.

 

The only thing I know to be true about the Law in relation to the APD is; there is a rigid consistency to the inconsistent manner which the APD capriciously chooses to enforce, or disregard, mutations of the Law. And, therefore – even though I am a Canadian citizen by birth – the APD might decide to suddenly arrange simultaneous permanent deportation and rendition to any number of blatantly hostile countries.

 

I remain excruciatingly tethered to ever-mutating pervasive paralyzing consequences relentlessly foisted upon me from the sustained tornado of inescapable Criminal Victimization entrenched within my home via decrees facilitating rampant Criminal Activity tortuously dominating my residence; as well as suffering a seemingly-eternal, unalterable ongoing de facto policy advocating stringently focused selective relegation of Disenfranchising Marginalization.

 

The only indisputable outcome of a Misconduct Complaint is a resultant punitive pattern of pervasive Police Misconduct from which there is no escape. Rule-Of-Law ceases to be a consideration in transactions with the APD. Officers are free to violate laws at will without ever enduring any negative consequences for illegal conduct. If the APD desires an outcome of extra-judicial destruction of my life, there is nothing I can do to prevent such an outcome.

 

 

With an abysmally Amputated Life,

James Allen Ratzlaff